Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Benjamin Bonzi Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wong vs Bonzi analysis and find out who is favored!
Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Benjamin Bonzi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Wong 0 - 0 Bonzi
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wong has won 47.51% of points on their second serve, while Bonzi has won 51.84%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wong, in recent form, has won 48.39% of their opponent's second serve points, while Bonzi has won 49.28%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.6% and 31.51% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wong has saved 59.51% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bonzi has saved 55.91% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wong has won 57.75% of matches played (W/L 41/ 30), with Bonzi winning 47.83% (W/L 33/ 36) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 83/ 58), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Bonzi has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 24/ 12), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 56% (W/L 100/ 80).
- Player level: In the last year, Wong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.55% of matches (W/L 24/ 20), where as Bonzi has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.56% of matches (W/L 25/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wong has played against opponents with an average rank of 278.55 while Bonzi has played against players with an average rank of 253.62.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wong has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bonzi has won 45% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wong has converted 33.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bonzi has converted 41.74% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
172
Rank
166
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
152
Rank
42
High
28
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
56% (104-82)
Career Total W/L
61% (424-272)
42% (13-18)
YTD W/L
43% (16-21)
$23,250
Career Prize Money
$1,520,435
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Benjamin Bonzi For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Wong VS Bonzi
Sportsbook
Offer
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Chak Lam Coleman Wong | Benjamin Bonzi |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 42% (13/18) | 43% (16/21) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 45% (33/40) | 46% (42/49) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (355/375) | 49% (440/457) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 52% (13/12) | 33% (3/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 41% (7/10) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) | 75% (6/2) |
| Aces pg | 0.61 | 0.43 |
| Aces Total | 219 | 187 |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 89 | 83 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:9 | 1:47:29 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 336.29 | 268.38 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (1300/2325) | 61% (1724/2812) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (950/1300) | 69% (1187/1724) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (487/1025) | 52% (564/1088) |
| BPs Won% Total | 33% (72/216) | 42% (101/242) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (876/2368) | 38% (1097/2898) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) | 50% (2/2) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 13% (1/7) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 46% (12/14) | 52% (13/12) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (12/30) | 44% (16/36) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (6/10) | 64% (9/14) |
| Deciding Set W% | 30% (3/10) | 40% (6/15) |
| 1st set W, W | 77% (13/10) | 72% (18/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 23% (13/3) | 28% (18/5) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (18/3) | 16% (19/3) |
Chak Lam Coleman Wong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Zachary Svajda
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
1
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
7
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
27 of
32)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
22 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefano Napolitano
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
8
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
0
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
18 of
56)
58
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Billy Harris
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
23 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
15 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
51%
(
55 of
108)
1st Serve %
57%
(
64 of
113)
4
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
2
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
51%
(
27 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
39%
(
42 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
49 of
113)
115
Total Points Won
106
|
6-2 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Ethan Quinn
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
51%
(
27 of
53)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Stefan Kozlov
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-4 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Cannon Kingsley
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andres Andrade
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
50%
(
48 of
96)
1st Serve %
52%
(
49 of
95)
2
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
4
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
50%
(
24 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
43%
(
41 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
95)
100
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve %
49%
(
35 of
71)
6
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Benjamin Bonzi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Ryan Peniston
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
14 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
27 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(10) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
13
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
15 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
19 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
62
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Titouan Droguet
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
4
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
88%
(
36 of
41)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
14 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
25 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Stefano Napolitano
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
76%
(
38 of
50)
11
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Denis Kudla
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
18
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Patrick Kypson
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
47 of
70)
8
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Jay Clarke
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
7
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
29 of
36)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
18 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jozef Kovalik
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
49%
(
23 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Hugo Dellien
59%
(
49 of
83)
1st Serve %
76%
(
65 of
86)
2
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Wong Vs Bonzi Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Wong are available here and Bonzi photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
